.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

David @ Tokyo

Perspective from Japan on whaling and whale meat, a spot of gourmet news, and monthly updates of whale meat stockpile statistics



IWC Normalization meeting news

I've seen over the past few days that Australia and the USA are amongst a group of 26 nations that were invited by Japan to attend the IWC Normalization meeting in February, but have decided not to attend.

Elaine Lies at Reuters has the story:
Boycott may loom over Japan meeting on whaling
25 Jan 2007 12:15:36 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Elaine Lies

TOKYO, Jan 25 (Reuters) - Japan has called a special meeting of members of an international whaling group next month to help lift a global moratorium on hunting of whales, but several countries opposed to the practice may boycott the assembly.

The absence of anti-whaling nations from the meeting of members of the International Whaling Commission could leave the future of the world body in doubt.

Japan, which with other pro-whaling nations has long argued that the fractious IWC is no longer functional, offered last year to host a first-ever gathering to "normalise" the group.

The meeting, to be held from Feb. 13 to 15 in Tokyo, was officially announced on Thursday, just a day before international environmental group Greenpeace will set sail from New Zealand to again confront Japanese ships in the Southern Ocean which are carrying out what it calls scientific whaling.

Invitations were issued to all 72 IWC members, but so far only a handful of anti-whaling nations have said they will attend, Fisheries Agency official Hideki Moronuki said.

Some 26 anti-whaling nations, including Australia, have agreed to boycott the meeting, an Australian government official was quoted by the Fairfax newspapers in Australia as saying. Australian officials were not available for comment.

"It's really a shame if that occurs, and would make it very hard to see how the IWC proceeds from here on," Moronuki said.

"We're saying that we want to normalise, but if that article is true our opponents have chosen confrontation over conversation, and the meaning of the IWC is lost," he added.

The IWC presides over the fate of the Earth's largest creatures, which were almost driven to extinction before the whaling ban in 1986.

But the group is bitterly divided between countries that think whales still need to be protected, such as Australia, Britain and New Zealand, and countries that think some species are sufficiently abundant to be hunted again.

Japan, which leads the pro-whaling bloc and has gathered powerful support from African, Pacific and Caribbean nations, has killed thousands of whales since 1986 under a scientific whaling programme. Iceland and Norway ignore the moratorium and conduct commercial whaling.

Activists took a dim view of the renewed push for whaling.

"I think that there are things about the IWC that need to be changed, that need to be brought into the 21st century, but commercialisation is not one of them," said Bunny McDiarmid, executive director of Greenpeace New Zealand.

Some Japanese politicians have said leaving the IWC cannot be ruled out at some point in the future if nothing changes.
I'm both surprised and disappointed that 26 out of the 72 member nations of the IWC would refuse to attend this meeting. I could imagine that the hard-core anti-whalers of New Zealand, Australia and the UK might, but even the USA?

It makes a mockery of international agreements between sovereign nations when 26 states who have signed the ICRW, which is supposed to "provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry", will only support a type of conservation that has no place for any level of consumptive utilisation of those stocks, despite scientific advice that this is today possible.

Whale conservation is not some silly children's game, or a political trophy that needs not be taken seriously. This "all or nothing" approach by these 26 nations is shameful. Will it only be after Japan and other whaling nations have decided to dessert a hapless IWC before these nations realise their foolishness?

Some anti-whaling nations that may attend the Tokyo meeting apparently include Sweden and Switzerland. I lost the (possibly unreliable) source of that information however. Switzerland is one anti-whaling nation that did not originally vote for the commercial whaling moratorium (it abstained, "because it believed the proposal did not fulfil the Convention requirement of being based on scientific findings"). Sweden is a neighbour of the Norwegians.


Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home


June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   January 2010   February 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   February 2011   March 2011   May 2013   June 2013  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?