.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

David @ Tokyo

Perspective from Japan on whaling and whale meat, a spot of gourmet news, and monthly updates of whale meat stockpile statistics

12/02/2006

 

IWC Data Availability protocol and JARPA data

The IWC Scientific Committee has a page about their Data Availability protocol.

I noticed something curious particularly in this request, which is a
Request for access to samples/data from the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR), Tokyo, Japan under Procedure B(JCRM 6 (suppl.) and to the National Research Institute ofFar Seas Fisheries, Japan
The curious thing was one of the names included in the list of scientists requiring access to the ICR data:
(1) T. Polacheck (prinicipal), (2) D. Butterworth, (3) J. Cooke, (4) R. Leaper, (5) A. Punt and (6) T.D. Smith.
The reason for my curiosity was that one of these names in particular also happened to appear in 2005 amongst a list of names of scientists who refused to review the JARPA II research proposal.

Readers who follow the whaling issue closely will probably quickly guess which name it is, and share my curiosity (although those who are very familiar will not be surprised at all).

The list of 63 names can be found in the 2nd appendix of this document.

Curious indeed that one of the scientists who criticises Japan's research also had a need to gain access to their data.

UPDATE 2007/01/07: I've just realised that not one, but in fact two of the names listed above can be found in the list of 63.

The request is also accompanied by the following note on the final page:

NOTE: SUBSEQUENT TO THE PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED IT WAS REALISED THAT THE ABUNDANCE ESTIMATES FROM THE JARPA CRUISES WERE ALSO REQUIRED BUT HAD NOT BEEN EXPLICITLY INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL. ICR GENEROUSLY AGREED TO PROVIDE THESE DATA AS WELL
Generous of the ICR, although I imagine that they are more than happy to have their data used by the IWC Scientific Committee. That's the point, after all.

Having said this, one recalls that Claire Bass (another member IWC Scientific Committee, courtesy of the UK government) previously tried to tell me and my readers that the IWC Scientific Committee has "heavily and regularly (ie, for the last 20 years) criticised" the ICR's research. I pointed out the fallacy of this claim in my response to her, here.

"C. Bass" is another name that appeared in the big list of 63.

Labels: , ,


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   January 2010   February 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   February 2011   March 2011   May 2013   June 2013  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?