.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

David @ Tokyo

Perspective from Japan on whaling and whale meat, a spot of gourmet news, and monthly updates of whale meat stockpile statistics

11/15/2006

 

Greenpeace Japan's survey on opinion in Japan

Greenpeace's Japan arm has made some claims about opinion in Japan on whaling in their press release on the commencement of the JARPA II voyage.

They refer to a survey commissioned by them, which "showed that ... more than 70 % of Japanese do NOT support whaling in the Southern Ocean".

That's a creative way to express the results of the survey, because what was actually found in response to the main question of "do you support or oppose the resumption of commercial whaling" (page 4) was that
Having pointed that out, it's worth noting that the survey itself notes that the sampling methodology used involved selecting respondents from people registered in an Internet based "Cyber Panel", and that the results "are not necessarily representative of the whole population of Japan" (my translation, from page 2).

The strongest opposition to whaling was observed amongst university students, and the survey concludes in it's summary that (my translation, from page 7):
Amongst younger respondents, while there was a tendency to be opposed to a resumption in commercial whaling, respondents were not knowledgeable about whale environments or Japan's whaling, let alone aware of international decisions made by the IWC.

It could be said that opinions amongst younger respondents against a resumption in commercial whaling are by no means based on sufficient knowledge of whaling.
Greenpeace didn't quote that bit in their press release, either.

The survey naturally contained some leading questions, including references to the increasing stockpile levels, but making no mention of the increases in consumption and supply which are at play there.

I can but trust that going forward Greenpeace Japan will endeavour to provide the Japanese public with more complete information about whaling.

Labels: ,


Comments:
Hi David,

"the survey itself notes that the sampling methodology used involved selecting respondents from people registered in an Internet based "Cyber Panel", and that the results "are not necessarily representative of the whole population of Japan" (my translation, from page 2)"

I think this ruins the entire credibility of this survey. I can't believe Greenpeace can release such results. This is insulting people's intelligence.

I hope there won't be any accident this year. Sea Shepherd look more crazy than ever, though.
 
Hi! Isanatori-san,

>I hope there won't be any accident this year. Sea Shepherd look more crazy than ever, though.<

The crazy guys will interfere
more fiercely than ever.
I do hope our government will
cope with their madness
so that the whalers can do reseach
safely.

Their " Leviathan project" seems to fail because they might be lacking of money. This is nice.

But they say there are a few suprises to stop whaling of Japan.
Though I do not know it precisely,
it is highly probable for them to use such weapons as limpet mines or
small explosive devices.
Very dangerous.

Iwan Cambel should direct the police to investigate their vessel thoroughly.

Y/H(Japan)
 
"The crazy guys will interfere
more fiercely than ever.
I do hope our government will
cope with their madness
so that the whalers can do reseach
safely."

uh... exactly what kind of research are these whalers performing by killing their research subject with dynamite and cut them up into pieces and consume them?? Have these "researchers" find out anything about these whales other than how they taste?
 
> exactly what kind of research are these whalers performing

They are obtaining information about biological parameters of these populations and changes in them over time, pollutant studies, and so on.

There is a whole heap of information regarding data obtained through the recently completed JARPA programme at the ICR's homepage here.

The IWC's Scientific Committee is about to conduct it's own review of the research next month.
It previously reviewed the research results at the half-way point of the programme, and found that (amongst other things) the results had the potential to improve the IWC's management procedure for baleen whales.

An important thing to note is that the information obtained is really only useful to people who are interested in conservation and management of whale stocks.

People who are only interested in protecting every single whale will not find much value in these results. It may help to understand this context.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   January 2010   February 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   February 2011   March 2011   May 2013   June 2013  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?